On Tue, 2008.10.07, 281, Robert James Clay wrote: > On Oct 7, 2008, at 7:33 PM, green wrote: >> This package is hideously outdated: more than 4 years so. > > While it is true that it was last packaged from the site then, is any > of the information that is in the current package actually not valid?
No, I've not found anything that is incorrect. Thanks
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
