On Sat, Mar 18, 2006 at 10:59:02AM +0100, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: > On Sat, Mar 18, 2006 at 09:09:52AM +0000, David Watson wrote: > > I have prepared packages using the patch I submitted, I am currently going > > through NM and have been given the task of preparing an NMU for an RC bug. > > My AM (Martin Michlmayr) will sponsor the upload. > > > > I will ask Martin to upload the package if there are no objections. > > This address is for orphaned packages. You cannot NMU them, because > there is no maintainer. Instead, you can do a QA upload, which is a bit > like a NMU, but then without NMU version numbering, without asking > permission, etc. Use lintian to catch the most common issues in doing an > QA upload vs an NMU. > > Anyway, your AM knows all about it, and could tell you more. > > Considering the package's state, and the fact that's one major upstream > version behind (#259548), and that it has very few users according to > popcon, I wonder whether we're not better off just removing the package, > actually. This is another package probably-obsoleted by saods9.
Justin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
