Your message dated Mon, 23 Jan 2006 08:13:34 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Fixed in dfm 0.99.7-8 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -------------------------------------- Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jan 2006 01:38:35 +0000 >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 08 17:38:35 2006 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from 84-120-75-62.onocable.ono.com ([84.120.75.62] helo=chistera.yi.org) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EvlzW-0000nA-6p for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 08 Jan 2006 17:38:35 -0800 Received: from userid 1000 by chistera.yi.org with local (Exim 4.60) id 1Evlyz-0006kU-Vl for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 02:38:02 +0100 From: Adeodato =?utf-8?B?U2ltw7M=?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: dfm: FTBFS: build-depends on removed xlibs-dev Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 02:38:01 +0100 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 Package: dfm Version: 0.99.7-7 Severity: serious Hello, This is a serious bug filed against your package because it build-depends on xlibs-dev, which as announced in [1] a while ago, is no longer available in sid. This makes your package fail to build from source. [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/11/msg00022.html To fix this bug, you need to update your build-dependencies and substitute xlibs-dev for the list of individual X development libraries that your package needs to be built. You can find detailed information about how to do that in the DependsXlibsDev wiki page [2]. [2] http://wiki.debian.org/DependsXlibsDev As indicated by the Release Team [3], the full transition from XFree86 to Xorg is a release blocker for Etch, which means that Etch will not be released until this bug is fixed (or your package removed from testing). So, please, try to fix in a timely manner. [3] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2005/10/msg00004.html The number of affected packages by the xlibs-dev transition is huge, so if you feel like helping with patches or uploads, feel free to follow the instructions contained in the wiki page above. A list of affected packages can be found here [4]. [4] http://people.debian.org/~adeodato/release-usertag/transition-xlibs-dev Finally, if there's a strong reason for which your package should not be NMUed, please note so in this bug report. Prospective NMUers will read your reasoning, and will decide if it's strong enough to delay their upload. Thanks for your collaboration! -- Adeodato Simó dato at net.com.org.es Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org --------------------------------------- Received: (at 346662-done) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Jan 2006 07:13:43 +0000 >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 22 23:13:43 2006 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from mail.irb.hr ([161.53.22.8] ident=UNKNOWN) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1F0vtW-0004aY-PU; Sun, 22 Jan 2006 23:13:43 -0800 Received: from diziet.irb.hr (diziet.irb.hr [161.53.22.31]) by mail.irb.hr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id k0N7DKXX031327; Mon, 23 Jan 2006 08:13:20 +0100 Received: from diziet.irb.hr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.5/8.13.5/Debian-3) with ESMTP id k0N7DYrr026516; Mon, 23 Jan 2006 08:13:34 +0100 Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.5/8.13.5/Submit) id k0N7DYPS026514; Mon, 23 Jan 2006 08:13:34 +0100 From: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Fixed in dfm 0.99.7-8 Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 08:13:34 +0100 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 161.53.22.8 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 X-CrossAssassin-Score: 4 Source: dfm Source-Version: 0.99.7-8 Now that dfm is orphaned, NMU-fixed bugs can be closed. The original .changes file follows. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 22:03:52 +0100 Source: dfm Binary: dfm Architecture: source powerpc Version: 0.99.7-8 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Changed-By: Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Description: dfm - Desktop-File-Manager for X11 Closes: 193484 268501 277214 346662 Changes: dfm (0.99.7-8) unstable; urgency=low . * QA upload. * Orphan package, as maintainer asked for it in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=346662;msg=7;repeatmerged=no . * debian/control: Replace dependency on xlibs-dev (Closes: #346662) * debian/control: Update description (Closes: #277214, #268501) * Install .mo files (Closes: #193484) . * Housekeeping: + debian/rules upadte to dh 5. + Files: a441b011dcf7a9f81ed7cccf5c565dfa 663 x11 optional dfm_0.99.7-8.dsc 62f83e795d866b02d39014afb0018707 3321 x11 optional dfm_0.99.7-8.diff.gz db799e24ef1828a4ba68589664769ace 255332 x11 optional dfm_0.99.7-8_powerpc.deb -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFD0VQsmO5zOp3h7rERAkVuAJ9VuSdFynwafZmP8a+Yz6z2XFSeQACgj/53 M1IfpGGeumEEADHwjt48ZKU= =l/O8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]