Your message dated Mon, 19 Dec 2005 00:57:25 +0100 (CET)
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line squidguard: source contains cruft
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 May 2004 21:49:09 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat May 22 14:49:09 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from pd9511838.dip.t-dialin.net (spruce) [217.81.24.56]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BReMe-0004Ur-00; Sat, 22 May 2004 14:49:09 -0700
Received: (qmail 7221 invoked by uid 1001); 22 May 2004 21:47:49 -0000
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Toni Mueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: squidguard: source contains cruft
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.60
Date: Sat, 22 May 2004 23:47:49 +0200
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: squidguard
Severity: normal
Hello,
while trying to import squidguard into an archive for tla-buildpackage,
I find this file which makes tla-importdsc barf:
samples/.sample.conf.swp
Best,
--Toni++
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.26-1-686-smp
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 250428-done) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Dec 2005 23:57:28 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Dec 18 15:57:28 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from aphrodite.asd.jaze.nl ([82.94.246.244] helo=aphrodite.jaze.net)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
id 1Eo8PA-0007Ij-4g
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 18 Dec 2005 15:57:28 -0800
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by aphrodite.jaze.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A1B816F491
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 00:57:26 +0100 (CET)
Received: from aphrodite.jaze.net ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (aphrodite [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 23241-32 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Mon, 19 Dec 2005 00:57:25 +0100 (CET)
Received: from wm.kinkhorst.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
by aphrodite.jaze.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54C6316F490
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 19 Dec 2005 00:57:25 +0100 (CET)
Received: from 145.99.151.133
(SquirrelMail authenticated user tklists)
by wm.kinkhorst.com with HTTP;
Mon, 19 Dec 2005 00:57:25 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 00:57:25 +0100 (CET)
Subject: Re: squidguard: source contains cruft
From: "Thijs Kinkhorst" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.5.1 [CVS]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at aphrodite.jaze.net
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
> > while trying to import squidguard into an archive for tla-buildpackag=
e,
> > I find this file which makes tla-importdsc barf:
> >
> > samples/.sample.conf.swp
>
> This file is part of the upstream tarball, but is not shipped in the
> binary package. I don't think it's worthwhile to repackage the upstream
> tarball just to remove this file, especially since I don't see what har=
m
> it does.. if you don't mind I'll close this bug.
No comments, closing.
Thijs
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
