Your message dated Tue, 29 Nov 2005 06:04:08 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Jan 2002 11:50:51 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jan 19 05:50:51 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from p508512fa.dip.t-dialin.net (localhost) [80.133.18.250] 
        by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
        id 16Ru1K-0000os-00; Sat, 19 Jan 2002 05:50:50 -0600
Received: (qmail 13952 invoked from network); 19 Jan 2002 11:22:38 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO localhost) (127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 19 Jan 2002 11:22:38 -0000
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
        by localhost (8.12.1/8.12.0.Beta7/Debian 8.12.0.Beta7-1) id 
g0JBMZUJ013809;
        Sat, 19 Jan 2002 12:22:35 +0100
Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2002 12:22:35 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Toni Mueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: bug 3.3.10
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Subject: zope-ldap: upgrading starts zope even if it wasn't running before
Package: zope-ldap
Version: 1.1.0-2
Severity: normal


Hello,

upgrading this package (and most other zope related packages, too) starts zope
no matter if it was running before or not. I find this undesirable and
would like to see that packages start daemons like this only if they were
running before.


Best,
--Toni++

-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Kernel Version: Linux schlepp 2.2.14 #2 SMP Sat May 6 17:13:33 CEST 2000 i686 
unknown

Versions of the packages zope-ldap depends on:
ii  python-ldap    1.8-1          An LDAP module for Python.
ii  zope           2.3.3-1        The Z Object Publishing Environment

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 129948-done) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Nov 2005 05:04:24 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 28 21:04:24 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.irb.hr ([161.53.22.8] ident=UNKNOWN)
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50)
        id 1EgxfE-0008Sy-8l; Mon, 28 Nov 2005 21:04:24 -0800
Received: from diziet.irb.hr (diziet.irb.hr [161.53.22.31])
        by mail.irb.hr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-3) with ESMTP id jAT542ns031298;
        Tue, 29 Nov 2005 06:04:02 +0100
Received: from diziet.irb.hr (localhost [127.0.0.1])
        by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.5/8.13.5/Debian-3) with ESMTP id jAT548Lm005473;
        Tue, 29 Nov 2005 06:04:08 +0100
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
        by diziet.irb.hr (8.13.5/8.13.5/Submit) id jAT5487R005471;
        Tue, 29 Nov 2005 06:04:08 +0100
From: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Removed
Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 06:04:08 +0100
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 161.53.22.8
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,ONEWORD,
        SORTED_RECIPS autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

zope-ldap has been removed from Debian after being orphaned for 5
months.  Please see <http://bugs.debian.org/312860> for details.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to