Your message dated Wed, 16 Nov 2005 15:42:20 -0800
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#260944: fixed in libxml-ruby 0.3.4-4
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Jul 2004 21:55:50 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jul 22 14:55:50 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from zero.voxel.net [209.123.232.253] (postfix)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BnlXa-0006C6-00; Thu, 22 Jul 2004 14:55:50 -0700
Received: from [192.168.0.225] (hq.voxel.net [66.109.37.2])
by zero.voxel.net (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 7E1FD24AF21; Thu, 22 Jul 2004 17:55:48 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [Fwd: libxml-ruby1.8: shouldn't be in section interpreters?]
From: Andres Salomon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: DAIX Boris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-0yrcTvARPN/N/aMOMB9N"
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2004 17:57:10 -0400
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 1.5.90
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
--=-0yrcTvARPN/N/aMOMB9N
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-wYZ4cxuD2PD0WvQchZym"
--=-wYZ4cxuD2PD0WvQchZym
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Package: libxml-ruby1.8
Severity: wishlist
Version: 0.3.4-1
Sure, I can do that. However, if there's going to be a dedicated ruby
section, I'll hold off. Any idea what the status is on a ruby section?
--=20
Andres Salomon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--=-wYZ4cxuD2PD0WvQchZym
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Description: Forwarded message - libxml-ruby1.8: shouldn't be in
section interpreters?
Content-Type: message/rfc822
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from clsmtps1.edf.fr (clsmtps1.edf.fr [192.54.193.124]) by
zero.voxel.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B381124AE07 for
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 22 Jul 2004 05:05:56 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from clsmtps1.edf.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.edf.fr
(Postfix) with ESMTP id 468178D378 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 22 Jul
2004 11:05:51 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from clserv02.edf.fr (clserv02.edf.fr [130.98.118.118]) by
clsmtps1.edf.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD3F48D252 for
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 22 Jul 2004 11:04:54 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from cli20h9.der.edf.fr (cli20h9.der.edf.fr [130.98.91.16]) by
clserv02.edf.fr (8.12.9-20030923/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i6M94sEf008706
for
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 22 Jul 2004 11:04:54 +0200 (MET DST)
Received: from cli34ah.der.edf.fr (cli70me [130.98.4.43]) by
cli20h9.der.edf.fr (8.11.6+Sun/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i6M94sg11613 for
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 22 Jul 2004 11:04:54 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from daix by cli34ah.der.edf.fr with local (Exim 3.36 #1
(Debian)) id 1BnZVe-0005Fr-00 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 22 Jul 2004
11:05:02 +0200
To: Andres Salomon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: libxml-ruby1.8: shouldn't be in section interpreters?
X-Debbugs-CC: Boris Daix <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: DAIX Boris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2004 11:05:02 +0200
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Package: libxml-ruby1.8
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
I've looked forward this ruby lib for a long time... Thanks for the
job!
My only remark at this point is that I would have thought that
libxml-ruby1.8 should live in section interpreters instead of admin,
as other ruby libs do (e.g. libxmlrpc-ruby, libyaml-ruby, etc.). We
may probably think of a dedicated ruby section, as perl and python
ones: but it may already have been suggested (?).
thanks
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.21
Locale: LANG=3Dfr_FR, LC_CTYPE=3Dfr_FR
--=-wYZ4cxuD2PD0WvQchZym--
--=-0yrcTvARPN/N/aMOMB9N
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQBBADg178o9R9NraMQRAh+3AJwN5SQL5y0BcR1ulXBVToQhj7h7qQCfW6a2
mP0aY0Z59EWxa7NduaEa+n4=
=Rr5p
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-0yrcTvARPN/N/aMOMB9N--
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 260944-close) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Nov 2005 23:51:42 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Nov 16 15:51:42 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from joerg by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1EcWuy-0000zh-UH; Wed, 16 Nov 2005 15:42:20 -0800
From: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: lisa $Revision: 1.30 $
Subject: Bug#260944: fixed in libxml-ruby 0.3.4-4
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Joerg Jaspert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 15:42:20 -0800
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Source: libxml-ruby
Source-Version: 0.3.4-4
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
libxml-ruby, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
libxml-ruby1.8_0.3.4-4_i386.deb
to pool/main/libx/libxml-ruby/libxml-ruby1.8_0.3.4-4_i386.deb
libxml-ruby_0.3.4-4.diff.gz
to pool/main/libx/libxml-ruby/libxml-ruby_0.3.4-4.diff.gz
libxml-ruby_0.3.4-4.dsc
to pool/main/libx/libxml-ruby/libxml-ruby_0.3.4-4.dsc
libxml-ruby_0.3.4-4_all.deb
to pool/main/libx/libxml-ruby/libxml-ruby_0.3.4-4_all.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated libxml-ruby package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2005 17:38:06 +0100
Source: libxml-ruby
Binary: libxml-ruby libxml-ruby1.8
Architecture: source all i386
Version: 0.3.4-4
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA Group <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description:
libxml-ruby - Ruby interface to libxml
libxml-ruby1.8 - Ruby interface to libxml
Closes: 260944 282759
Changes:
libxml-ruby (0.3.4-4) unstable; urgency=low
.
* QA upload.
* Add a libxml-ruby metapackage as recommended by Debian Ruby Policy.
Closes: #282759.
* Change section to interpreters. Closes: #260944.
* debian/copyright: Update upstream URL.
* debian/dirs: $(sitedir) already handled by the Makefile; remove.
* debian/docs: README and TODO already handled by cdbs; remove.
* debian/watch: Add.
* Conforms to Standards version 3.6.2.
Files:
17f86fed463d05a3496392825603aac1 663 interpreters optional
libxml-ruby_0.3.4-4.dsc
0a1fb9724379e2fa152c6ece7d5b767d 3472 interpreters optional
libxml-ruby_0.3.4-4.diff.gz
fb8ed293271e0f637952bd450174f240 760 interpreters optional
libxml-ruby_0.3.4-4_all.deb
bf9f1c8875e1b3fb7cdb26d73d08aa17 32926 interpreters optional
libxml-ruby1.8_0.3.4-4_i386.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDd2xYxBYivKllgY8RAgpHAJ9r3kmE0GHCUonF7dbRIjdjQrCw1wCfVrSG
b8Yx6MTPpH6eVWToIc61mn0=
=uvGU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
