Your message dated Tue, 18 Oct 2005 04:17:07 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#300923: fixed in re2c 0.9.10-2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Mar 2005 17:53:10 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 22 09:53:10 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mmk.hagener-tgz.de (ibook.steinmann.cx) [195.37.128.18]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DDnYz-00015M-00; Tue, 22 Mar 2005 09:53:10 -0800
Received: by ibook.steinmann.cx (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 1E5392BD08; Tue, 22 Mar 2005 18:36:52 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: steinm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: re2c: New version 0.9.4 available
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.9
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 18:36:52 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
Package: re2c
Version: 0.9.1-6
Severity: minor
There is a new version 0.9.4 available since 2005-03-12. E.g. building
php from cvs needs it.
Uwe
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing')
Architecture: powerpc (ppc)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-rc4
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) (ignored:
LC_ALL set to [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Versions of packages re2c depends on:
ii libc6 2.3.2.ds1-20 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libgcc1 1:3.4.3-12 GCC support library
ii libstdc++5 1:3.3.5-12 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 300923-close) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Oct 2005 11:18:31 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 18 04:18:31 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1ERpSt-0002hQ-00; Tue, 18 Oct 2005 04:17:07 -0700
From: Paul Wise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#300923: fixed in re2c 0.9.10-2
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2005 04:17:07 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Source: re2c
Source-Version: 0.9.10-2
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
re2c, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
re2c_0.9.10-2.diff.gz
to pool/main/r/re2c/re2c_0.9.10-2.diff.gz
re2c_0.9.10-2.dsc
to pool/main/r/re2c/re2c_0.9.10-2.dsc
re2c_0.9.10-2_i386.deb
to pool/main/r/re2c/re2c_0.9.10-2_i386.deb
re2c_0.9.10.orig.tar.gz
to pool/main/r/re2c/re2c_0.9.10.orig.tar.gz
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Paul Wise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated re2c package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2005 17:41:50 +0800
Source: re2c
Binary: re2c
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.9.10-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA Group <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Paul Wise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description:
re2c - Tool for generating fast C-based recognizers
Closes: 300923
Changes:
re2c (0.9.10-2) unstable; urgency=low
.
[ QA Group upload ]
* debian/changelog: restore 0.9.1-7 changelog entry
* debian/rules:
- remove -I. from CFLAGS (redundant)
- remove INSTALL* cruft (not used)
- touch build-stamp to prevent running the tests twice
- use make distclean is buggy, so do the equivalent of it using rm
- add binary-indep target as it is required by policy
- re2c.1 already installed by upstream
* debian/watch:
- use version=2 for dehs compatability
- quote .tar.gz
.
re2c (0.9.10-1) unstable; urgency=low
.
[ QA Group upload ]
* New upstream release
* Add Homepage to package description
.
re2c (0.9.9-2) unstable; urgency=low
.
[ QA Group upload ]
* Clean the source tree properly
* Remove prerm/postinst
* Strip binaries properly
* Fix examples permissions
.
re2c (0.9.9-1) unstable; urgency=low
.
[ QA Group upload ]
* New upstream release (Closes: #300923)
* Add watch file
* Update to latest standards version (no changes)
* Modernise debian/rules
* Run tests during build
* Update debian/copyright
Files:
754790cfaade7966ec71d93e9c5120ba 583 devel optional re2c_0.9.10-2.dsc
dcd255714581530fbd490e51243f5c8c 243006 devel optional re2c_0.9.10.orig.tar.gz
9558d8fbc267f24181813a49bf7fca4e 2948 devel optional re2c_0.9.10-2.diff.gz
5b7a8b26fe0d97cc860051dcbc048177 128478 devel optional re2c_0.9.10-2_i386.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDVNfexBYivKllgY8RAtHCAKDl7FzeE5HWV7bsopWVPJbxkw14vACdH9J4
6TPuzj2l1E/cN36uEvhWblA=
=sBw/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
