Your message dated Tue, 06 Sep 2005 05:47:06 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#326834: fixed in robotour 3.1.1-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Sep 2005 01:14:11 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Sep 05 18:14:11 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from farad.aurel32.net [82.232.2.251] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
        id 1ECS2M-0003aF-00; Mon, 05 Sep 2005 18:14:11 -0700
Received: from hertz.aurel32.net ([2001:618:400:fc13:2e0:18ff:fea3:b80f])
        by farad.aurel32.net with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32)
        (Exim 4.50)
        id 1ECS2L-0000Rr-K3; Tue, 06 Sep 2005 03:14:09 +0200
Received: from aurel32 by hertz.aurel32.net with local (Exim 4.52)
        id 1ECS26-000Eq3-Kn; Tue, 06 Sep 2005 03:13:54 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Aurelien Jarno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: robotour(GNU/k*BSD): FTBFS: out of date config.sub/config.guess
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.17
Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2005 03:13:53 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.8 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS,
        HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02

Package: robotour
Version: 3.1.1-2
Severity: important

Hello,


The current version of robotour fails to build on GNU/kFreeBSD, 
because of outdated config.guess and config.sub.

The versions of config.guess and config.sub in robotour are too
old to correctly support Debian GNU/k*BSD.  A version is needed
from this year, which is available in the autotools-dev packages
that are in current sarge, and sid.

You can simply copy them manually, but it can also be done 
automatically using the method described in
/usr/share/doc/autotools-dev/README.Debian.gz 

It would also be nice if you cans ask upstream to update 
config.guess and config.sub in their next release.


Thanks for your cooperation.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: kfreebsd-i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: GNU/kFreeBSD 5.3-1
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 326834-close) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Sep 2005 12:50:05 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 06 05:50:05 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from katie by spohr.debian.org with local (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
        id 1ECcqw-00082C-00; Tue, 06 Sep 2005 05:47:06 -0700
From: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.56 $
Subject: Bug#326834: fixed in robotour 3.1.1-3
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2005 05:47:06 -0700
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2

Source: robotour
Source-Version: 3.1.1-3

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
robotour, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

robotour_3.1.1-3.diff.gz
  to pool/main/r/robotour/robotour_3.1.1-3.diff.gz
robotour_3.1.1-3.dsc
  to pool/main/r/robotour/robotour_3.1.1-3.dsc
robotour_3.1.1-3_i386.deb
  to pool/main/r/robotour/robotour_3.1.1-3_i386.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated robotour package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Tue,  6 Sep 2005 14:31:57 +0200
Source: robotour
Binary: robotour
Architecture: source i386
Version: 3.1.1-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA Group <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Matej Vela <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 robotour   - Control mobile robots in this programmer's game
Closes: 326834 326844
Changes: 
 robotour (3.1.1-3) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * QA upload.
   * Automatically update config.guess and config.sub from autotools-dev.
     Closes: #326834.
   * Add build dependencies on xlibmesa-gl-dev and libglu1-xorg-dev.
     Closes: #326844.
   * Store id pointers in `void *' as `int' is not wide enough on 64-bit
     architectures.
Files: 
 0c1cff80f9af9817f1c9e2cbb3fa00ce 628 games optional robotour_3.1.1-3.dsc
 bb3bbe7101c7573ceabb5ccc95e49d21 4824 games optional robotour_3.1.1-3.diff.gz
 1c3fd08d57c78d735eed7bd8fd1eaa61 631134 games optional 
robotour_3.1.1-3_i386.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDHYyWxBYivKllgY8RAu2yAJ9tyNT/9vx/u1cUlwwWi/qpNRwGbgCglGye
geoqM/3k9P8pf6BkUGsJPzo=
=7XM4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to