Your message dated Mon, 30 Aug 2004 19:55:31 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 May 1999 12:09:06 +0000
Received: (qmail 3088 invoked from network); 17 May 1999 12:09:05 -0000
Received: from pot.cnuce.cnr.it (HELO fly.cnuce.cnr.it) ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
by master.debian.org with SMTP; 17 May 1999 12:09:05 -0000
Received: by fly.cnuce.cnr.it
id m10jMCV-00080wC
(Debian Smail-3.2.0.102 1998-Aug-2 #2); Mon, 17 May 1999 14:08:55 +0200
(CEST)
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 17 May 1999 14:08:55 +0200 (CEST)
From: Francesco Potorti` <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Linux bug list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Shouldn't raidtools be statically linked?
Organization: CNUCE-CNR, Via S.Maria 36, Pisa - Italy +39-050-593211
Package: raidtools
Version: 0.42-17
Severity: wishlist
Wouldn't it be wiser to statically link the raidtools? think about what
happened if they exhibited the problem others program exhibit with the new
libc6-2.1: no hope of mounting the raid devices.
-- System Information
Debian Release: potato
Kernel Version: Linux pot 2.2.8 #1 Fri May 14 14:21:25 CEST 1999 i686 unknown
Versions of the packages raidtools depends on:
ii libc6 2.1.1-5 GNU C Library: Shared libraries and timezone
ii dpkg 1.4.1.1 Package maintenance system for Debian Linux
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 37846-done) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Aug 2004 18:55:50 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 30 11:55:50 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from sorrow.cyrius.com [65.19.161.204]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1C1rJm-0001E5-00; Mon, 30 Aug 2004 11:55:50 -0700
Received: by sorrow.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 10)
id 1762164D44; Mon, 30 Aug 2004 18:55:50 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by unjust.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 85D383F07B; Mon, 30 Aug 2004 19:55:31 +0100 (BST)
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 19:55:31 +0100
From: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Removed
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040722i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 2
raidtools (version 1) has been removed; this was only needed for
kernel 2.0 or 2.2 or so. raidtools2 works for current kernels.
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
