Your message dated 10 Aug 2004 22:30:11 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line bugs done
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Dec 2001 11:55:17 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Dec 26 05:55:17 2001
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13] (root)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 16JCeS-0008DC-00; Wed, 26 Dec 2001 05:55:16 -0600
Received: from bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [130.149.19.1])
by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA18775
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 26 Dec 2001 12:55:09 +0100 (MET)
Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
by bolero.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.10.2+Sun/8.9.3) id fBQBt9319738;
Wed, 26 Dec 2001 12:55:09 +0100 (MET)
From: Matthias Klose <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2001 12:55:08 +0100
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: inprecise build dependencies
X-Mailer: VM 6.89 under 21.1 (patch 14) "Cuyahoga Valley" XEmacs Lucid
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: python-bsddb3
Version: 3.3.0-1
Severity: serious
- the package has to build-depend on python-dev (>= 2.1), python-dev
(<< 2.2), as the binary does. This can result in wrong dependencies.
- the package does not compile/remove the *.py[co] files in the
postinst/prerm. Please see /usr/share/doc/python2.1/sample.* for
examples.
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 126490-done) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Aug 2004 05:32:09 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 10 22:32:09 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from vp085189.reshsg.uci.edu (becket.becket.net) [128.195.85.189]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Bulib-0007VA-00; Tue, 10 Aug 2004 22:32:09 -0700
Received: from tb by becket.becket.net with local (Exim 4.34)
id 1Bulia-000784-Lp; Tue, 10 Aug 2004 22:32:08 -0700
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: bugs done
X-Reply-Permission: Posted or emailed replies to this message constitute
permission for an emailed response.
X-PGP-Fingerprint: 1F0A1E51 63 28 EB DA E6 44 E5 5E EC F3 04 26 4E BF 1A 92
X-Tom-Swiftie: "I can't get this fire started," Tom said woodenly
From: Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 10 Aug 2004 22:30:11 -0700
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Lines: 9
User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Bug 126490, 165999: fixed by maintainer in 3.3.0-2 and 3.3.0-5, but he
used a different email address so they were only marked closed,
instead of fixed.
Bug 185372, 168447, 204702: Fixed by NMU 3.3.0-5.1, 3.3.0-5.2, and
3.3.0-5.2, and became accepted when the package was taken by QA in
version 3.3.0-6.
