Your message dated Mon, 09 Aug 2004 17:47:27 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#209903: fixed in ppxp 0.2001080415-10
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Sep 2003 21:48:12 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 09 16:48:10 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from dat.etsit.upm.es [138.100.17.73]
by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19wp0k-0007Lm-00; Tue, 09 Sep 2003 15:22:50 -0500
Received: (qmail 11444 invoked by uid 1013); 9 Sep 2003 20:22:49 -0000
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 22:22:49 +0200
From: Javier =?iso-8859-1?Q?Fern=E1ndez-Sanguino_Pe=F1a?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: The package description does not follow Debian policy
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE,USER_AGENT_MUTT
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_27
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_27
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Package: ppxp-tcltk
Version: 0.2001080415-8
Severity: important
Justification: section 2.3.3
Your package does not comply with the policy as it does not provide
a proper extended descrition. Policy section 2.3.3 states:
The description should be written so that it gives the system
administrator enough information to decide whether to install the
package.
Take in account that package descriptions are very important to administrators
to determine wether a package is (or isn't) useful for them and are
used by package frontends in order to implement keyword-based searchs
(samples include command line tools such as 'apt-cache search X'
or 'grep-dctrl -F Description X' or even fancier interfaces such as
'dpkg-iasearch').
If you need help to provide a proper description for your package you
are advised to digest the README/manpages/HTML files provided by the package
or, as a last resort, request help at the debian-devel mailing list.
If this package is being generated from a single source package and
you already provide a full description in your control file for the
main package, you might want to use it automatically in sub-packages. If this
is the case consider using ${description}, and debian/substvars.
This report has been automatically generated and the main reason is that
the package has an extended description which is only one line long.
Regards
Javier Fernandez-Sanguino
PS: For more information please read the Debian Policy or the thread
at debian-devel started by
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
which is available at
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2003/debian-devel-200306/msg01257.html
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 209903-close) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Aug 2004 21:53:25 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Aug 09 14:53:25 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BuI57-00080D-00; Mon, 09 Aug 2004 14:53:25 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BuHzL-0005te-00; Mon, 09 Aug 2004 17:47:27 -0400
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thomas Bushnell, BSG)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.51 $
Subject: Bug#209903: fixed in ppxp 0.2001080415-10
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 09 Aug 2004 17:47:27 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Source: ppxp
Source-Version: 0.2001080415-10
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
ppxp, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
ppxp-dev_0.2001080415-10_powerpc.deb
to pool/main/p/ppxp/ppxp-dev_0.2001080415-10_powerpc.deb
ppxp-tcltk_0.2001080415-10_powerpc.deb
to pool/main/p/ppxp/ppxp-tcltk_0.2001080415-10_powerpc.deb
ppxp-x11_0.2001080415-10_powerpc.deb
to pool/main/p/ppxp/ppxp-x11_0.2001080415-10_powerpc.deb
ppxp_0.2001080415-10.diff.gz
to pool/main/p/ppxp/ppxp_0.2001080415-10.diff.gz
ppxp_0.2001080415-10.dsc
to pool/main/p/ppxp/ppxp_0.2001080415-10.dsc
ppxp_0.2001080415-10_powerpc.deb
to pool/main/p/ppxp/ppxp_0.2001080415-10_powerpc.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Thomas Bushnell, BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated ppxp package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2004 14:19:10 -0700
Source: ppxp
Binary: ppxp-tcltk ppxp ppxp-dev ppxp-x11
Architecture: source powerpc
Version: 0.2001080415-10
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian QA Group <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Thomas Bushnell, BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description:
ppxp - Yet another PPP program
ppxp-dev - development kit for ppxp consoles development
ppxp-tcltk - tk console of ppxp
ppxp-x11 - X console of ppxp
Closes: 209903 209931
Changes:
ppxp (0.2001080415-10) unstable; urgency=low
.
* QA Upload.
* Give better descriptions for ppxp-tcltk and ppxp-x11.
(Closes: #209903, 209931)
* Repair English in description of ppxp-dev.
Files:
2ef14311974483217e6ade4057880b6c 702 net optional ppxp_0.2001080415-10.dsc
32125dff856af1b38b0f36b8f9e2dd74 8579 net optional ppxp_0.2001080415-10.diff.gz
308a10f004e33c17c27f90f5d41510ed 239870 net optional
ppxp_0.2001080415-10_powerpc.deb
e29d326d2cf6227fcbe7e404a41e43da 69188 net optional
ppxp-x11_0.2001080415-10_powerpc.deb
9f6888cd17f70464c23e0bbe63bea823 60672 net optional
ppxp-tcltk_0.2001080415-10_powerpc.deb
dcbabbd9b947e411a8f6f158fd752d29 78562 devel optional
ppxp-dev_0.2001080415-10_powerpc.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFBF+uXqMsB9b6fcOoRAki/AKCPbzYOrikP4k5Ix3K2XOPYTWPe/QCfZbQt
vFgHYJS9/3ay3BmVg8IeEqU=
=hRCO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
