Your message dated Mon, 13 Oct 2003 14:20:51 +1000
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Sep 2003 13:06:34 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Sep 26 08:03:43 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mars.mj.nl [81.91.1.49] 
        by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1A2sG7-0002NJ-00; Fri, 26 Sep 2003 08:03:43 -0500
Received: (qmail 8767 invoked from network); 26 Sep 2003 13:03:42 -0000
Received: from 81-91-5-95-customer.mjdsl.nl (HELO thanatos.localdomain) 
(81.91.5.95)
  by www.mj.nl with SMTP; 26 Sep 2003 13:03:42 -0000
Received: by thanatos.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1001)
        id 248B810D5DF; Fri, 26 Sep 2003 15:03:36 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Thomas Hood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: xisp: Please support resolvconf
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.29
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2003 15:03:36 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-BadReturnPath: [EMAIL PROTECTED] rewritten as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  using "From" header
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0
        tests=HAS_PACKAGE
        version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_9_21
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_9_21 
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

Package: xisp
Version: unavailable; reported 2003-09-26
Severity: wishlist

Xisp's /etc/ppp/ip-up.d/0xisp-dns and /etc/ppp/ip-down.d/0xisp-dns
add and remove nameserver lines from /etc/resolv.conf .  This is
incompatible with the functioning of the resolvconf package which
itself wants to take control of /etc/resolv.conf .

To make the above scripts resolvconf-compatible, please surround
the code that changes /etc/resolv.conf with an if ... then, as
follows

    if [ ! -x /sbin/resolvconf ] ; then
    ... current code that changes /etc/resolv.conf ...
    fi

This change needs to be made in both /etc/ppp/ip-up.d/0xisp-dns
and /etc/ppp/ip-down.d/0xisp-dns.  Thanks.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux thanatos 2.4.22 #1 Mon Sep 1 09:45:41 CEST 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C


---------------------------------------
Received: (at 212841-done) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Oct 2003 04:21:16 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Oct 12 23:21:16 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from bangpath.uucico.de [195.71.9.197] 
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1A8uCo-0006J4-00; Sun, 12 Oct 2003 23:21:14 -0500
Received: by bangpath.uucico.de (Postfix, from userid 10)
        id 2FBD726B27; Mon, 13 Oct 2003 06:21:14 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by deprecation.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
        id 439F8FE99; Mon, 13 Oct 2003 14:20:51 +1000 (EST)
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2003 14:20:51 +1000
From: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
        [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Removed
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.5 required=4.0
        tests=BAYES_01
        version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_09
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_09 
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

This package has been removed from Debina unstable because it was
unmaintained for quite a while.

-- 
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to