Your message dated Sun, 21 Sep 2003 17:55:29 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#212005: tux-aqfh: uninstallable in sid due to dependency
on plib1.5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Sep 2003 16:46:19 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 21 11:46:17 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from quetzlcoatl.dodds.net [64.22.202.19]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1A17Ll-0003S8-00; Sun, 21 Sep 2003 11:46:17 -0500
Received: by quetzlcoatl.dodds.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id DD6A43AE5; Sun, 21 Sep 2003 11:46:16 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2003 11:46:16 -0500
From: Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: tux-aqfh: uninstallable in sid due to dependency on plib1.5
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="P+33d92oIH25kiaB"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_20,HAS_PACKAGE
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_9_20
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_9_20
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
--P+33d92oIH25kiaB
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Package: tux-aqfh
Version: 1.0.14-5
Severity: grave
The tux-aqfh package is currently uninstallable in sid due to a broken
dependency on an outdated version of plib. Please rebuild tux-aqfh
against the current plib package (plib1c102).
Thanks,
--=20
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
--P+33d92oIH25kiaB
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD4DBQE/bdXYKN6ufymYLloRAliGAKCduTx5nc+tmgRtwSmO+IQGEbKdKwCYgn8I
qmtArFhB3NDhL5mL4tQ+AQ==
=f9zC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--P+33d92oIH25kiaB--
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 212005-done) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Sep 2003 16:55:34 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Sep 21 11:55:31 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from chiark.greenend.org.uk [193.201.200.170]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1A17Uh-0004gS-00; Sun, 21 Sep 2003 11:55:31 -0500
Received: from [192.168.124.112] (helo=riva.lab.dotat.at)
by chiark.greenend.org.uk (Debian Exim 3.35 #1) with esmtp
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]
id 1A17Ug-0005pI-00; Sun, 21 Sep 2003 17:55:31 +0100
Received: from cjwatson by riva.lab.dotat.at with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]
id 1A17Uf-0002sD-00; Sun, 21 Sep 2003 17:55:29 +0100
Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2003 17:55:29 +0100
From: Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#212005: tux-aqfh: uninstallable in sid due to dependency on
plib1.5
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.7 required=4.0
tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_9_20
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_9_20
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
On Sun, Sep 21, 2003 at 11:46:16AM -0500, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Package: tux-aqfh
> Version: 1.0.14-5
> Severity: grave
>
> The tux-aqfh package is currently uninstallable in sid due to a broken
> dependency on an outdated version of plib. Please rebuild tux-aqfh
> against the current plib package (plib1c102).
Er, no:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/ftp/pool/main/t/tux-aqfh]$ for x in
tux-aqfh_1.0.14-5_*.deb; do dpkg -f "$x" Depends; done
tux-aqfh-data (= 1.0.14-5), libc6.1 (>= 2.3.1-1), libgcc1 (>= 1:3.3-0pre9),
libglut3, libstdc++5 (>= 1:3.3-0pre9), plib1c102 (<< 1.6.1), plib1c102 (>=
1.6.0), xlibmesa3-gl | libgl1, xlibmesa3-glu | libglu1, xlibs (>> 4.1.0)
tux-aqfh-data (= 1.0.14-5), libc6 (>= 2.3.1-1), libgcc1 (>= 1:3.3-0pre9),
libglut3, libstdc++5 (>= 1:3.3-0pre9), plib1c102 (<< 1.6.1), plib1c102 (>=
1.6.0), xlibmesa3-gl | libgl1, xlibmesa3-glu | libglu1, xlibs (>> 4.1.0)
tux-aqfh-data (= 1.0.14-5), libc6 (>= 2.3.1-1), libgcc1 (>= 1:3.3-0pre9),
libglut3, libstdc++5 (>= 1:3.3-0pre9), plib1c102 (<< 1.6.1), plib1c102 (>=
1.6.0), xlibmesa3-gl | libgl1, xlibmesa3-glu | libglu1, xlibs (>> 4.1.0)
tux-aqfh-data (= 1.0.14-5), libc6 (>= 2.3.1-1), libgcc1 (>= 1:3.3-0pre9),
libglut3, libstdc++5 (>= 1:3.3-0pre9), plib1c102 (<< 1.6.1), plib1c102 (>=
1.6.0), xlibmesa3-gl | libgl1, xlibmesa3-glu | libglu1, xlibs (>> 4.1.0)
tux-aqfh-data (= 1.0.14-5), libc6.1 (>= 2.3.1-1), libgcc1 (>= 1:3.3-0pre9),
libglut3, libstdc++5 (>= 1:3.3-0pre9), plib1c102 (<< 1.6.1), plib1c102 (>=
1.6.0), xlibmesa3-gl | libgl1, xlibmesa3-glu | libglu1, xlibs (>> 4.1.0)
tux-aqfh-data (= 1.0.14-5), libc6 (>= 2.3.1-1), libgcc1 (>= 1:3.3-0pre9),
libglut3, libstdc++5 (>= 1:3.3-0pre9), plib1c102 (<< 1.6.1), plib1c102 (>=
1.6.0), xlibmesa3-gl | libgl1, xlibmesa3-glu | libglu1, xlibs (>> 4.1.0)
tux-aqfh-data (= 1.0.14-5), libc6 (>= 2.3.1-1), libgcc1 (>= 1:3.3-0pre9),
libglut3, libstdc++5 (>= 1:3.3-0pre9), plib1c102 (<< 1.6.1), plib1c102 (>=
1.6.0), xlibmesa3-gl | libgl1, xlibmesa3-glu | libglu1, xlibs (>> 4.1.0)
tux-aqfh-data (= 1.0.14-5), libc6 (>= 2.3.1-1), libgcc1 (>= 1:3.3-0pre9),
libglut3, libstdc++5 (>= 1:3.3-0pre9), plib1c102 (<< 1.6.1), plib1c102 (>=
1.6.0), xlibmesa3-gl | libgl1, xlibmesa3-glu | libglu1, xlibs (>> 4.1.0)
tux-aqfh-data (= 1.0.14-5), libc6 (>= 2.3.1-1), libgcc1 (>= 1:3.3-0pre9),
libglut3, libstdc++5 (>= 1:3.3-0pre9), plib1c102 (<< 1.6.1), plib1c102 (>=
1.6.0), xlibmesa3-gl | libgl1, xlibmesa3-glu | libglu1, xlibs (>> 4.1.0)
tux-aqfh-data (= 1.0.14-5), libc6 (>= 2.3.1-1), libgcc1 (>= 1:3.3-0pre9),
libglut3, libstdc++5 (>= 1:3.3-0pre9), plib1c102 (<< 1.6.1), plib1c102 (>=
1.6.0), xlibmesa3-gl | libgl1, xlibmesa3-glu | libglu1, xlibs (>> 4.1.0)
tux-aqfh-data (= 1.0.14-5), libc6 (>= 2.3.1-1), libgcc1 (>= 1:3.3-0pre9),
libglut3, libstdc++5 (>= 1:3.3-0pre9), plib1c102 (<< 1.6.1), plib1c102 (>=
1.6.0), xlibmesa3-gl | libgl1, xlibmesa3-glu | libglu1, xlibs (>> 4.1.0)
tux-aqfh (1.0.14-5) unstable; urgency=low
* QA upload.
* Build-depend on gcc-3.2 version of plib-dev (closes: #196871).
-- Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sat, 21 Jun 2003 14:09:49 +0100
plib needs to be hinted into testing, that's all, but that has to wait
until a current gcc-3.3 is in so that flightgear becomes a valid
candidate.
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
