Laurent Fousse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi,
> Le Sun, Aug 17, 2003 at 06:47:23PM +0200, martin f krafft écrivait: > > any updates on this? i am not going to maintain megahal, but i > > believe that the patch should only be included if it makes its way > > upstream. > I didn't send the patch upstream but I tried it on latest CVS > version and it applied fine (btw latest released version 9.1.0 and > CVS version don't differ much). David, you seem to be part of > upstream: whom should I send the patch? > The feature I requested on the bts has been requested upstream as > well: > http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=654776&group_id=10585&atid=360585 > In #164903, Daniel Silverstone showed an interest in taking over the > package. Is it still the case, because I might be interested as > well? As far as I can tell, none of the people who has declared an interest in working on megahal upstream has ever done anything. I am more than happy to add you as a developer on SF if you are interested in working on the code. Just send me your sourceforge login. -- David N. Welton Consulting: http://www.dedasys.com/ Personal: http://www.dedasys.com/davidw/ Free Software: http://www.dedasys.com/freesoftware/ Apache Tcl: http://tcl.apache.org/
