Your message dated Tue, 15 Jul 2003 13:22:25 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line removed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 31 Mar 2003 19:29:17 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 31 13:29:16 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from calc.cheney.cx [207.70.165.48] (mail)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 1904y4-0006tX-00; Mon, 31 Mar 2003 13:29:16 -0600
Received: from ccheney by calc.cheney.cx with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1904y3-0000N0-00; Mon, 31 Mar 2003 13:29:15 -0600
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Chris Cheney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: kinkatta: needs new(?) upstream and rebuild against KDE3/Qt3
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.10.1
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2003 13:29:15 -0600
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Chris Cheney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.2 required=4.0
tests=HAS_PACKAGE,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
version=2.44
X-Spam-Level:
Package: kinkatta
Version: 1.09.20020304-2 (not installed)
Severity: grave
Tags: sid
Justification: renders package unusable
kinkatta is currently built against KDE2/Qt2 but its version number
appears to be different than upstreams so I am not sure which one it is.
There is a version 1.0-kde3.0 available upstream for KDE3/Qt3 support.
Also when rebuilt against Qt3 please insure that it is built against the
libqt3-mt version.
Thanks,
Chris
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux calc 2.4.21-pre4-ac4 #1 Sun Feb 16 00:37:14 CST 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 187046-done) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Jul 2003 11:22:33 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jul 15 06:22:23 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from bangpath.uucico.de [195.71.9.197]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19cNt1-0002LE-00; Tue, 15 Jul 2003 06:22:23 -0500
Received: by bangpath.uucico.de (Postfix, from userid 10)
id 1FBDC26D15; Tue, 15 Jul 2003 13:22:23 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by regression.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id DAD2E22AA6; Tue, 15 Jul 2003 13:22:25 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2003 13:22:25 +0200
From: Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: removed
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_01,USER_AGENT_MUTT
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_27
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_27
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
the package has been removed, so this is not relevant anymore.
--
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
