Your message dated 15 Jul 2003 08:55:23 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line fixed with -5
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Jun 2003 10:43:38 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jun 17 05:43:37 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mclean.mail.mindspring.net [207.69.200.57] 
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 19SDw9-0000B1-00; Tue, 17 Jun 2003 05:43:37 -0500
Received: from user-119bq03.biz.mindspring.com ([66.149.232.3])
        by mclean.mail.mindspring.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1)
        id 19SDw8-0002ty-00
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 17 Jun 2003 06:43:36 -0400
Received: from daniel by user-119bq03.biz.mindspring.com with local (Exim 4.20)
        id 19SDw7-0006xW-Pp
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 17 Jun 2003 03:43:35 -0700
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: libgtop: FTBFS with gcc-3.3: Invalid preprocessor pasting
From: Daniel Schepler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2003 03:43:35 -0700
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: Daniel Schepler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0
        tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE
        version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_10
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_10 
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

Package: libgtop
Version: 1.0.13-4
Severity: serious

>From my build log:

...
gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -D_IN_LIBGTOP -D_GNU_SOURCE -DGLIBTOP_NAMES -I.. -I.. 
-I../sysdeps/linux -I../include -I../intl -I/usr/include/gnome-1.0 
-DNEED_GNOMESUPPORT_H -I/usr/lib/gnome-libs/include -I/usr/include/glib-1.2 
-I/usr/lib/glib/include -I/usr/include/orbit-1.0 -I/usr/include/gtk-1.2 
-I/usr/include/glib-1.2 -I/usr/lib/glib/include -g -O2 -Wall -Wunused   
-DGLIBTOP_GUILE -DGLIBTOP_GUILE_NAMES   -DGTOPLOCALEDIR=\"/usr/share/locale\" 
-DLIBGTOP_VERSION=\"1.0.13\" -DLIBGTOP_SERVER_VERSION=\"5\" 
-DLIBGTOP_VERSION_CODE=1000013 -DLIBGTOP_SERVER=\"/usr/bin/libgtop_server\"    
-g -O2 -Wall -Wunused  -c sysdeps.c
sysdeps.c:106:34: pasting "GLIBTOP_SYSDEPS_CPU" and ")" does not give a valid 
preprocessing token
sysdeps.c:108:34: pasting "GLIBTOP_SYSDEPS_MEM" and ")" does not give a valid 
preprocessing token
sysdeps.c:110:35: pasting "GLIBTOP_SYSDEPS_SWAP" and ")" does not give a valid 
preprocessing token
...
make[3]: *** [sysdeps.o] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/libgtop-1.0.13/examples'
make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/libgtop-1.0.13'
make[1]: *** [all-recursive-am] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/tmp/buildd/libgtop-1.0.13'
make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux frobnitz 2.4.21-pre5 #1 Sat Mar 1 09:01:10 PST 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C


-- 
Daniel Schepler              "Please don't disillusion me.  I
[EMAIL PROTECTED]    haven't had breakfast yet."
                                 -- Orson Scott Card

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 197759-done) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Jul 2003 06:51:32 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jul 15 01:51:29 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from www.hostsharing.net (pima.hostsharing.net) [212.42.230.151] 
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 19cJer-0002ZO-00; Tue, 15 Jul 2003 01:51:29 -0500
Received: from p4.domain.lan (p508EAC22.dip.t-dialin.net [80.142.172.34])
        (using SSLv3 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits))
        (No client certificate requested)
        by pima.hostsharing.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25E162CEAD0
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 15 Jul 2003 08:51:28 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: fixed with -5
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?No=E8l_K=F6the?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; 
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-M+I5JJypf3nkhFz56XK7"
Organization: Debian GNU/Linux, www.debian.org
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.3 
Date: 15 Jul 2003 08:55:23 +0200
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.3 required=4.0
        tests=PGP_SIGNATURE_2,USER_AGENT_XIMIAN
        version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_27
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_27 
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)


--=-M+I5JJypf3nkhFz56XK7
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I fixed this in version -5

--=20
No=C3=A8l K=C3=B6the <noel debian.org>
Debian GNU/Linux, www.debian.org

--=-M+I5JJypf3nkhFz56XK7
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQA/E6Vb9/DnDzB9Vu0RAmN5AJ44OXXm/Sce8AN52p2UAIzZF2BlvgCgmoUT
pI/Do0Mh0lxfP0V2c7/2rYc=
=cyA8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-M+I5JJypf3nkhFz56XK7--

Reply via email to