Your message dated 26 Apr 2003 14:12:47 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line #169974
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Nov 2002 07:22:48 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Nov 21 01:22:47 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mallard.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.48] 
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
        id 18Elfj-0003RQ-00; Thu, 21 Nov 2002 01:22:47 -0600
Received: from user-vcaunmd.dsl.mindspring.com ([216.175.94.205] 
helo=frobnitz.ddts.net)
        by mallard.mail.pas.earthlink.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1)
        id 18Elfj-00033R-00
        for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 20 Nov 2002 23:22:47 -0800
Received: from daniel by frobnitz.ddts.net with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
        id 18Elfi-0002yH-00
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 20 Nov 2002 23:22:46 -0800
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: awe: Pure virtual build-depends on libxaw-dev
From: Daniel Schepler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Daniel Schepler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2002 23:22:46 -0800
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.1 required=5.0
        tests=SPAM_PHRASE_01_02
        version=2.41
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: awe
Severity: normal

This source package Build-Depends on libxaw-dev, which is wrong because it's
a pure virtual package.  You need to specify a specific version of
libxaw-dev to be used (either libxaw6-dev or, preferably, libxaw7-dev).

(This is an automatically generated bug report based on an initial
template and on the contents of the Sources file for the main section.)

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 169974-done) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Apr 2003 12:13:53 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Apr 26 07:13:53 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from www.hostsharing.net (mail.hostsharing.net) [212.42.230.151] 
        by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
        id 199OYz-0001JF-00; Sat, 26 Apr 2003 07:13:53 -0500
Received: from p4.domain.lan (p508EA17D.dip.t-dialin.net [80.142.161.125])
        (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits))
        (No client certificate requested)
        by mail.hostsharing.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D398E292BA8
        for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 26 Apr 2003 14:13:51 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: #169974
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?No=E8l_K=F6the?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Organization: Debian GNU/Linux, www.debian.org
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.4 
Date: 26 Apr 2003 14:12:47 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.3 required=4.0
        tests=BAYES_01,USER_AGENT_XIMIAN
        version=2.53
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

Hello,

this is corrected with the replacing awesfx package.

-- 
Noèl Köthe <noel debian.org>
Debian GNU/Linux, www.debian.org

Reply via email to