Your message dated Thu, 10 Apr 2003 19:11:41 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line siag: siag fails to run (relocation error)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 20 Dec 2002 04:36:26 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Dec 19 22:36:25 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from (romana) [207.215.68.169]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18PEtd-0007lh-00; Thu, 19 Dec 2002 22:36:25 -0600
Received: from wotan ([192.168.0.2] helo=wotan.hajhouse.org)
by romana with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 18PEuz-0002Na-00; Thu, 19 Dec 2002 20:37:49 -0800
Received: from hajhouse by wotan.hajhouse.org with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 18OpXx-0001AR-00; Wed, 18 Dec 2002 17:32:21 -0800
From: Henry House <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: siag: siag fails to run (relocation error)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: bug 3.3.10.2
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Henry House <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2002 17:32:21 -0800
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=3.3 required=5.0
tests=DATE_IN_PAST_24_48,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level: ***
Package: siag
Version: N/A
Severity: grave
Siag will not run at all!
wotan:~$ siag
siag: relocation error: siag: undefined symbol: stat
-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Kernel Version: Linux wotan 2.4.19-rc1 #1 SMP Fri Jul 5 17:24:01 PDT 2002 i686
Pentium III (Katmai) GenuineIntel GNU/Linux
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 173738-done) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Apr 2003 18:11:49 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 10 13:11:46 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from host81-103-170-60.not-set-yet.ntli.net (cyclone) [81.103.170.60]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 193gWW-0006xH-00; Thu, 10 Apr 2003 13:11:44 -0500
Received: from aps100 by cyclone with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 193gWU-0002MS-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 10 Apr 2003 19:11:42 +0100
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2003 19:11:41 +0100
From: Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: siag: siag fails to run (relocation error)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="nFreZHaLTZJo0R7j"
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Monty-Python: No-one expects the Spanish Inquisition!
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Sender: Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=4.0
tests=PGP_SIGNATURE_2,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT,
USER_AGENT_MUTT
version=2.44
X-Spam-Level:
--nFreZHaLTZJo0R7j
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Unreproducible, no response from submitter... this was probably a
transient glibc bug that is no longer present.
--=20
.''`. ** Debian GNU/Linux ** | Andrew Suffield
: :' : http://www.debian.org/ | Dept. of Computing,
`. `' | Imperial College,
`- -><- | London, UK
--nFreZHaLTZJo0R7j
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE+lbPdlpK98RSteX8RAsVgAJ0eYOfJGlyfamQIo1HEtaT22kP22wCfTDfd
acNOUGfUfHQDyGdRJyQRXKw=
=hwXF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--nFreZHaLTZJo0R7j--
