Your message dated Sun, 26 Jan 2003 17:32:21 -0500 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#132140: fixed in colorgcc 1.3.2-6 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -------------------------------------- Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Feb 2002 18:36:24 +0000 >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Feb 03 12:36:24 2002 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from pcow035o.blueyonder.co.uk (blueyonder.co.uk) [195.188.53.121] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 16XRV2-0006Uv-00; Sun, 03 Feb 2002 12:36:24 -0600 Received: from pcow035o.blueyonder.co.uk ([127.0.0.1]) by blueyonder.co.uk with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.5.1877.757.75); Sun, 3 Feb 2002 18:36:23 +0000 Received: from localhost (unverified [62.30.104.135]) by pcow035o.blueyonder.co.uk (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.2.9) with ESMTP id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 3 Feb 2002 18:36:23 +0000 Received: from malcolm by localhost with local (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 16XR1e-0003OL-00 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 03 Feb 2002 18:06:02 +0000 From: Malcolm Parsons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: colorgcc: Files in etc not marked as conffiles Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2002 18:06:02 +0000 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: colorgcc Version: 1.3.2-4.1 Severity: Serious Justification: Policy 11.7 colorgcc contains files in /etc that are not marked as conffiles. This violates a must in Debian Policy, so is a Serious bug. This is a mass bug submission, and has been discussed on debian-devel starting at http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2002/debian-devel-200201/msg02546.html For details of which files in colorgcc are not marked as conffiles see http://lintian.debian.org/reports/Tfile-in-etc-not-marked-as-conffile.html If your maintainer scripts modify these files, they must not be shipped in the package. If your maintainer scripts do not modify these files then they must be marked as conffiles. Example configuration files should be placed in /usr/share/doc/colorgcc/examples See Debian Policy 11.7 for more information. --------------------------------------- Received: (at 132140-close) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Jan 2003 22:38:11 +0000 >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 26 16:38:11 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from auric.debian.org [206.246.226.45] (mail) by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18cvPm-0007cx-00; Sun, 26 Jan 2003 16:38:10 -0600 Received: from katie by auric.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 18cvK9-0000bW-00; Sun, 26 Jan 2003 17:32:21 -0500 From: David Weinehall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.29 $ Subject: Bug#132140: fixed in colorgcc 1.3.2-6 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2003 17:32:21 -0500 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of colorgcc, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: colorgcc_1.3.2-6.diff.gz to pool/main/c/colorgcc/colorgcc_1.3.2-6.diff.gz colorgcc_1.3.2-6.dsc to pool/main/c/colorgcc/colorgcc_1.3.2-6.dsc colorgcc_1.3.2-6_all.deb to pool/main/c/colorgcc/colorgcc_1.3.2-6_all.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. David Weinehall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated colorgcc package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2003 00:09:42 +0100 Source: colorgcc Binary: colorgcc Architecture: source all Version: 1.3.2-6 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: David Weinehall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Changed-By: David Weinehall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Description: colorgcc - Colorizer for GCC warning/error messages Closes: 103215 115215 123500 132140 147011 174440 Changes: colorgcc (1.3.2-6) unstable; urgency=low . * New maintainer (Closes: #123500) * debian/control rewritten * Fixed debian/copyright to only reference the GPL * Cleaned up debian/changelog (only cosmetical changes) * Colorize g77 too (Closes: #174440) * Added gobjc while at it * Build-Depends-Indep on debhelper (>> 4.1.0) | No more /usr/doc * Bumped compat-version to 4 * Rewrote debhelper configuration * Added a modified version of the manual-page by Joe Wreschnig (Closes: #103215, #115215) * Changed all references to the upstream website to point at its new location * Fixed colorgcc to recognize gcc-3.0 and akin (Closes: #147011) * 1.3.2-4.2 marked /etc/colorgc/colorgccrc as a conffile (Closes: #132140) Files: 7ee70a7d30179161d08c32fe833e2b94 571 devel extra colorgcc_1.3.2-6.dsc d9e297bc34b8ebd4a20be1caff028faa 4926 devel extra colorgcc_1.3.2-6.diff.gz e6af458c63cd918ee182b34357c0b9da 9528 devel extra colorgcc_1.3.2-6_all.deb -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE+M/Y1QSseMYF6mWoRAg+KAJ4roRk+iAq6AUbibbtm/nHwcim5JQCbBoxB Byyrc0FXjdmIUD1onUGaXDM= =VaGW -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----