severity 82908 wishlist clone 82908 -1 retitle 82908 elm-me+: mail.services not good enough retitle -1 elm-me+: editing headers using arrow keys stop
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > retitle 82908 elm-me+: Problem connecting to POP3 and editing headers using > arrow keys > severity 82908 normal First, you have been explained twice the documented, working procedure for handling the situation. If you dislike it, the only appropriate severity is `wishlist' (the likely tag being `wontfix'). Second, the two issues are in no way related, and must be filed as separate reports. Third, you omitted my question about README.ME+. > Actually the timeout was around 30 minutes and it didn't get through > anyway. (You were talking about a configurable timeout, so I assumed a minimum practical value.) > 15-30 seconds wouldn't be such a big of deal if, at the end, it actually > connected. If I had to wait 30 seconds for Elm to connect to POP3, where > IMAP is totally disabled because I didn't create elsewhere mentioned text > file, then I would accept it. That is absurd. You would rather waste time each and every day than write a single line to a single file once? There is *no chance* this will ever be implemented. > > So you agree that it's upstream call? > > There is no good (and, especially, safe) answer to that. :-) Upstream > doesn't support binary distributions and Debian doesn't change (much) what > upstream distributes. Especially now, when there is no "real" Debian > maintainer. > > So, I don't agree, nor disagree. I believe I will make my mind once I try > new Elm. Until then do whatever suits you. Why reply if you have nothing to say?
