Your message dated Thu, 31 Mar 2005 17:17:21 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#286777: fixed in webmin-snort 1.1-3
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Dec 2004 05:21:39 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Dec 21 21:21:39 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from sccrmhc11.comcast.net [204.127.202.55] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1CgywN-0005Ws-00; Tue, 21 Dec 2004 21:21:39 -0800
Received: from train.is-a-geek.org ([24.245.9.227])
          by comcast.net (sccrmhc11) with ESMTP
          id <2004122205210801100auqq0e>; Wed, 22 Dec 2004 05:21:08 +0000
Received: by train.is-a-geek.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
        id A6F1039E11; Tue, 21 Dec 2004 23:20:53 -0600 (CST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: "Mike Mestnik) (The Archmage Forever" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: conf_rules.cgi: Rule file cannot be found 
(/etc/snort/$RULE_PATH/scan.rules).
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.5
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2004 23:20:52 -0600
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: webmin-snort
Version: 1.1-2
Severity: normal

This is the default Debian config file, to set $RULE_PATH to
"/etc/snort/rules".  If you don't want to read this from the cfg file then
you should hardcode "/etc/snort/rules" in.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
Architecture: sparc (sparc64)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.26-cheako
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)

Versions of packages webmin-snort depends on:
ii  perl                          5.8.4-5    Larry Wall's Practical Extraction 
ii  snort                         2.2.0-7    Flexible Network Intrusion Detecti
ii  webmin                        1.160-2    Web-based administration toolkit

-- no debconf information

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 286777-close) by bugs.debian.org; 31 Mar 2005 22:24:07 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 31 14:24:07 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from gluck.debian.org [192.25.206.10] 
        by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1DH859-0006qX-00; Thu, 31 Mar 2005 14:24:07 -0800
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
        by gluck.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1DH858-00031q-00; Thu, 31 Mar 2005 15:24:06 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
        id 1DH7yb-0006dL-00; Thu, 31 Mar 2005 17:17:21 -0500
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jaldhar H. Vyas)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.55 $
Subject: Bug#286777: fixed in webmin-snort 1.1-3
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 17:17:21 -0500
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
        (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
        autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Source: webmin-snort
Source-Version: 1.1-3

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
webmin-snort, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

webmin-snort_1.1-3.diff.gz
  to pool/main/w/webmin-snort/webmin-snort_1.1-3.diff.gz
webmin-snort_1.1-3.dsc
  to pool/main/w/webmin-snort/webmin-snort_1.1-3.dsc
webmin-snort_1.1-3_all.deb
  to pool/main/w/webmin-snort/webmin-snort_1.1-3_all.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated webmin-snort package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 16:50:47 -0500
Source: webmin-snort
Binary: webmin-snort
Architecture: source all
Version: 1.1-3
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Webmin maintainers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Jaldhar H. Vyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 webmin-snort - snort control module for webmin
Closes: 286777 296481 300567
Changes: 
 webmin-snort (1.1-3) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Adopted by the Webmin maintainer group.  (Closes: #300567)
   * Changed the snort rules path in default config to /etc/snort/rules
     (Closes: #286777, #296481)
Files: 
 9ed9e73e71af78653a040cfbe5c556e8 667 admin optional webmin-snort_1.1-3.dsc
 57ac8a3a131d345e30964cbc64a2211a 2965 admin optional webmin-snort_1.1-3.diff.gz
 9b7d772ade8379a7558500bf9bcb7edc 25216 admin optional 
webmin-snort_1.1-3_all.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCTHYF2kYOR+5txmoRAlmLAJ0TejnzHXiJVAAzl4TDiyni44Mu6wCglugz
TiQX0xPEQ0zeqLUxuzKmljE=
=UCG8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to