Package: shx Severity: normal Tags: patch When building 'shx' on amd64 with gcc-4.0, I get the following error:
hx_commands.c: In function 'expand_path': hx_commands.c:2954: error: invalid lvalue in assignment With the attached patch 'shx' can be compiled on amd64 using gcc-4.0. Regards Andreas Jochens diff -urN ../tmp-orig/shx-0.1.49/hx_commands.c ./hx_commands.c --- ../tmp-orig/shx-0.1.49/hx_commands.c 2001-09-01 18:32:03.000000000 +0200 +++ ./hx_commands.c 2005-03-07 14:02:59.271076567 +0100 @@ -2951,7 +2951,7 @@ epchr = 0; ambig = 0; for (fh = cfl->fh; (u_int32_t)((char *)fh - (char *)cfl->fh) < cfl->fhlen; - (char *)fh += flen + SIZEOF_HL_DATA_HDR) { + fh = (char *)fh + flen + SIZEOF_HL_DATA_HDR) { L16NTOH(flen, &fh->len); L32NTOH(fnlen, &fh->fnlen); if (fnlen >= len && !strncmp(fh->fname, ent, len)) { @@ -3030,7 +3030,7 @@ continue; for (fh = cfl->fh; (u_int32_t)((char *)fh - (char *)cfl->fh) < cfl->fhlen; - (char *)fh += flen + SIZEOF_HL_DATA_HDR) { + fh = (char *)fh + flen + SIZEOF_HL_DATA_HDR) { L16NTOH(flen, &fh->len); L32NTOH(fnlen, &fh->fnlen); len = strlen(cfl->path) + 1 + fnlen + 1; @@ -3113,7 +3113,7 @@ return 0; for (fh = cfl->fh; (u_int32_t)((char *)fh - (char *)cfl->fh) < cfl->fhlen; - (char *)fh += flen + SIZEOF_HL_DATA_HDR) { + fh = (char *)fh + flen + SIZEOF_HL_DATA_HDR) { L16NTOH(flen, &fh->len); L32NTOH(fnlen, &fh->fnlen); if ((int)fnlen == len && !strncmp(fh->fname, ent, len)) diff -urN ../tmp-orig/shx-0.1.49/hx_tty.c ./hx_tty.c --- ../tmp-orig/shx-0.1.49/hx_tty.c 2001-08-29 13:40:38.000000000 +0200 +++ ./hx_tty.c 2005-03-07 14:03:17.188618151 +0100 @@ -1080,7 +1080,7 @@ struct hl_filelist_hdr *fh; for (fh = cfl->fh; (u_int32_t)((char *)fh - (char *)cfl->fh) < cfl->fhlen; - (char *)fh += ntohs(fh->len) + SIZEOF_HL_DATA_HDR) { + fh = (char *)fh + ntohs(fh->len) + SIZEOF_HL_DATA_HDR) { fnlen = ntohl(fh->fnlen); for (i = 0, bpos = 0; i < fnlen && bpos < sizeof(buf); i++) { if (!isgraph(fh->fname[i])) { -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]