Thanks all for the feedback. On Tue, Jun 09, 2026 at 11:24:35AM +0500, Andrey Rakhmatullin wrote: >But also neither httpx2 nor httpxyz provide `import httpx` (they expect >you to import them `as httpx`), so I wouldn't expect the Debian packages >provide that, so technically all of them can coexst
I agree with Andrey's point that httpx2 and httpcore2 are not intended to be drop-in replacements for the existing httpx and httpcore packages, as they can coexist with the existing packages. >On Tue, Jun 09, 2026 at 04:44:24AM +0200, Carsten Schoenert wrote: #1139440 >>this library is build from the same source as the httpx2 library, no need to >>create another source package. Regarding packaging, my current inclination would be to keep httpx2 and httpcore2 as separate source packages, matching how httpx and httpcore are currently packaged in Debian. However, this is mostly for consistency with the current packaging, and I would not have any objections to packaging them together in a single source package given that they are developed together upstream today. Also, thank you, Carsten, for your willingness to sponsor this work. Thanks as well for the packaging suggestions. I'll take them into account while preparing the packages. -- Thanks, Polkorny
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
