On 17-11-2025 19:45, Mahangu Weerasinghe wrote:
I've pushed my work to Salsa - https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/datasetteThe package builds successfully with gbp and lintian passes.Could I please request a sponsor to provide feedback and potentially upload this package? ITP here - https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1120835
I've had a look at the files (didn't run any tests).in d/changelog, since this is a NEW package, only the notes about Initial Release that closes the bug should suffice.
Other than that, the packaging looks fine to me. You should file a RFS bug (upload your package to https://mentors.debian.net and use the RFS template) and also type "!rfs datasette" in #debian-python on IRC which adds your package to the RFS queue so that a potential sponsor can stumble across your package and sponsor it if they wish to.
Thank you! Best, MahanguOn Mon, Nov 17, 2025 at 6:27 PM Mahangu Weerasinghe <[email protected]> wrote:Noted, thank you! I filed an ITP bug for this package here - https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1120835 On Mon, Nov 17, 2025 at 2:36 PM Aryan Karamtoth <[email protected]> wrote: On 17-11-2025 06:11, Mahangu Weerasinghe wrote: > Hi folks, > I'm considering packaging datasette - > https://github.com/simonw/datasette - for Debian. It's a Python tool > for exploring and publishing data as an interactive website. > > datasette runs as a server, making it well-suited for apt installation. > > All dependencies are already in Debian and I've built and installed > the package locally. > > Would this be appropriate for Python Team maintenance? Any objections > or suggestions before I create the Salsa repository? Thank you! > > Best, > Mahangu I don't see the need for asking this as this is a python package and the team is meant for maintaining just for these kind of packages. If you're already in the Salsa team, you can proceed with the repository and packaging. No need to ask for the permission explicitly as you were already given maintainer access just for that. That said, if you feel that this package is worth being packaged into Debian and will be actually useful to the users or devs, sure you can go with that if you feel its fit. You can file a ITP bug and cc it to the debian-devel mailing list to let others know that you're packaging it.-- Regards,Aryan Karamtoth, Sponsored Maintainer @Debian Ports Maintainer @FreeBSD IRC: SpaciousCoder78 Matrix: @SpaciousCoder78:matrix.org <http://matrix.org> XMPP: [email protected] GPG Fingerprint: 7A7D 9308 2BD1 9BAF A83B 7E34 FE90 07B8 ED64 0421
-- Regards, Aryan Karamtoth, Sponsored Maintainer @Debian Ports Maintainer @FreeBSD Matrix: @SpaciousCoder78:matrix.org XMPP:[email protected] GPG Fingerprint: 7A7D 9308 2BD1 9BAF A83B 7E34 FE90 07B8 ED64 0421
OpenPGP_0xFE9007B8ED640421.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

