On 2025-06-30 7 h 22 a.m., Antoine Le Gonidec wrote:
packaging recommendations.I cannot even find such slight divergens from rules... everything looks fineHere is the part of the Python Team policy I was thinking about:DPT requires a pristine-tar branch, and only upstream tarballs can be used to advance the upstream branch. Complete upstream Git history should be avoided in the upstream branch.I instead included the full upstream git history, not a tarball import as a single commit. Branch names are not following the Team policy either, with "debian/latest" instead of "debian/master", and "master" instead of "upstream". This can all be fixed while still producing the exact same packages, I plan to work on that soon.Since this is missing from my original request, and as illustrated by the snippet above: I have obviously read the Python Team policy and am ready to go out of my way to follow it.
Welcome to the team! -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Louis-Philippe Véronneau ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋ po...@debian.org / veronneau.org ⠈⠳⣄
OpenPGP_0xE1E5457C8BAD4113.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature