On 2025-06-30 7 h 22 a.m., Antoine Le Gonidec wrote:
packaging recommendations.

I cannot even find such slight divergens from rules...
everything looks fine

Here is the part of the Python Team policy I was thinking about:
DPT requires a pristine-tar branch, and only upstream tarballs can be used
to advance the upstream branch. Complete upstream Git history should be
avoided in the upstream branch.
I instead included the full upstream git history, not a tarball import as a
single commit.

Branch names are not following the Team policy either, with "debian/latest"
instead of "debian/master", and "master" instead of "upstream".

This can all be fixed while still producing the exact same packages, I plan to
work on that soon.

Since this is missing from my original request, and as illustrated by the
snippet above: I have obviously read the Python Team policy and am ready to go
out of my way to follow it.


Welcome to the team!

--
  ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
  ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁  Louis-Philippe Véronneau
  ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋   po...@debian.org / veronneau.org
  ⠈⠳⣄

Attachment: OpenPGP_0xE1E5457C8BAD4113.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to