Hi Julian

Upload to unstable done.

Regards

Alastair

On 24/04/2025 07:37, Julian Gilbey wrote:
Hi Alastair,

It seems to be fine in experimental (though it is only debci-tested on
amd64 and arm64), so please do go ahead and upload -4 to unstable.
You don't need to request an unblock at this stage; see
https://release.debian.org/testing/freeze_policy.html#soft

Best wishes,

    Julian

On Mon, Apr 21, 2025 at 03:39:21PM +0100, Alastair McKinstry wrote:
H Anathanu

A patch to fix this has just been uploaded. Once it is safely tested in
experimental,   I'll request an unblock.

There was somehow a buggy -2 upload that missed the actual patch in d/rules

Best regards

Alastair

On 19/04/2025 11:56, Ananthu C V wrote:
Hi Alastair,

python-xarray currently reports several test failures[0]. If the package
migrates to testing, it'd fix #1100293[1] which otherwise could cause a lot
of AUTORM.

The test failures are on the 32bit archs (armel, armhf, and i386), as well as
s390x. The failures on 32bit archs don't look serious to me as they look like
either intended for 64bit, or false negatives. In that regard, I have a patch
that'd disable those failing tests conditionally on 32bit archs[2]. I can't,
however, push it to the team repo since it looks like the changes for the
previous upload (as well as the debian tags for the last two uploads) was
not pushed. If my patch seems reasonable to you, I can push it and do a team
upload once you push your changes to the repo, or add an MR if you'd prefer 
that.

As for the test failures on s390x, that comes from uninstallable build-depends
which tracks down to magics++ not building on s390x[3] (and other archs). So
either that needs to be fixed, or python-xarray and rdeps have to drop s390x.

[0] https://ci.debian.net/packages/p/python-xarray/
[1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1100293
[2] 
https://salsa.debian.org/weepingclown/python-xarray/-/commit/23bb201a0ac7ddab59e368cd342516d90ef8e47a
[3] https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=magics%2B%2B

--
Alastair McKinstry,
GPG: 82383CE9165B347C787081A2CBE6BB4E5D9AD3A5
e: alast...@mckinstry.ie, im: @alastair:mckinstry.ie @amckins...@mastodon.ie

Commander Vimes didn’t like the phrase “The innocent have nothing to fear,”
  believing the innocent had everything to fear, mostly from the guilty but in 
the longer term
  even more from those who say things like “The innocent have nothing to fear.”
  - T. Pratchett, Snuff



    Julian

--
Alastair McKinstry,
GPG: 82383CE9165B347C787081A2CBE6BB4E5D9AD3A5
e: alast...@mckinstry.ie, im: @alastair:mckinstry.ie @amckins...@mastodon.ie

Commander Vimes didn’t like the phrase “The innocent have nothing to fear,”
 believing the innocent had everything to fear, mostly from the guilty but in 
the longer term
 even more from those who say things like “The innocent have nothing to fear.”
 - T. Pratchett, Snuff

Reply via email to