Hi Thomas and DPT,

this update went (a bit unexpected :-) ) very well! But yeah, now Werkzeug and also Flask are up to date in unstable/testing! Not one single package needed any additional work.

Am 25.11.24 um 10:39 schrieb Carsten Schoenert:
Hrhr, I need to forward my answer to Thomas to the Debian Python Team as
even in my initial email I mixed up the correct email address from the
DPT. Sorry. :-(

...

Hello Thomas,

Am 23.11.24 um 13:36 schrieb Thomas Goirand:
...
Hi Carsten,

Thanks for your work, and thanks for letting us know what you intend to
do regarding these packages.

Uploading to experimental and checking for the excuse page for any
autopkgtest regression is the correct workflow. You do not need my
approval to do so. Please go ahead, and thanks in advance for your
contribution: that's much appreciated, especially for such high profile
packages.

thanks for confirming my point of view. We did the same one yer ago and
it worked well that way.
But I wanted to ask you somehow as you are currently listed in the
Uploaders field.

I've done the uploads of Werkzeug and also Flask yesterday and at least
for python-werkzeug it looks promising I'd say. No broken tests until
now. Fingers crossed!

https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?experimental=1&package=python-werkzeug

The package flask will need some more time so the autopkgtests can get
executed against 3.1.3-1.

https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?experimental=1&package=flask


--
Regards
Carsten

Reply via email to