On July 29, 2024 3:14:33 PM UTC, PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel 
<frederic-emmanuel.pi...@synchrotron-soleil.fr> wrote:
>> Maybe we indeed want a "minimal" autopkgtest environment, but many
>> upstream tests will fail in those and I don't see an automatic way to test
>> a random package in this way.
>
>Even if not minimal, at least correspond to the upstream declares dependencies.
>
>by 'declare' I am not even sure of the meaning.
>
>dependencies of the test can be different from the required installed ones.
>
>Maybe we should  install only the python binaries and the dependencies marked 
><!nocheck>.
>
>Is there a standard in the Python community for the test dependencies ?
>
As usual, there are several.

Scott K

Reply via email to