Hi! On Thu, Oct 12, 2023 at 05:03:45PM +0800, Bo YU wrote: > Hi！ > > Thanks for reviewing my package! > > > On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 3:51 AM Emmanuel Arias <eam...@yaerobi.com> wrote: > > > > On Mon, Oct 09, 2023 at 02:46:36PM -0300, Emmanuel Arias wrote: > > > Hi! > > > > > > On Sat, Oct 07, 2023 at 09:34:43PM +0800, Bo YU wrote: > > > > Hi team! > > > > > > > > Due to rfs bot maybe not work on debian-python irc, So I am seeking help > > > > to review/upload my new python package: > > > > > > > > https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/filecheck > > > > > > > > TIA. > > > To avoid duplicated work from another team member, I mention here, I'm > > > going to review this package. > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Emmanuel > > > > Hi!, > > > > Me again. > > > > I leave you some comments regarding to FileCheck > > > > * Binary package suggests install the docs package, but is not in > > d/control. > Done. Here the ideal situation should be a docs package on there, but if we > use > sphinx-build to build its doc, there is one guzzle_sphinx_theme does > not in Debian. > So I package its manpage to binary package.
OK. > > > * Package should depends on python3-poetry-core instead of python3-poetry > Done. > > > * d/copyright: upstream does not specify a range of date 2019-2023, only in > > docs/conf.py the copyright says 2019. > Yeah, although there are only one file flaged its date on 2019, but > how to judge the > whole project copyright date range? I just follow its the first commit: > > https://github.com/mull-project/FileCheck.py/commits/main?after=195aa1527a2572b4697ae0d5c604f0baceba805c+419&branch=main&qualified_name=refs%2Fheads%2Fmain > > Not sure this is right. I'd just use 2019, not a range. > > > * The package synopsis should not finished with a period. Please remove it. > Sorry, I am not very clear about here. Do you mean here: > https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/filecheck/-/blob/debian/main/debian/control#L30 > If yes, I think the synopsis solution should be more robust here. > Because it saves more space than > specially descriptions. > > please let me know if there is not true. Sorry, perhaps I was not clear, I mean remove the period at the end of line 20 [0]. > > > * The binary package should not be python3-filecheck? > You hint me here. So I spilted the origin package into python3 library > package and > its binary tool binary. this should be working. > > I have updated the package on salsa: > https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/filecheck > > Thanks again for reviewing the package! > > BR, > Bo > > > > Cheers, > > Emmanuel > > > > > > > > BR, > > > > Bo > > > > > > > > The rest looks good to me. [0] https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/filecheck/-/blob/debian/main/debian/control#L20
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
