On 2023-02-02 14:16:11 +0000 (+0000), c.bu...@posteo.jp wrote: [...] > The upstream maintainers have to create a binddep.txt file.
Yes, it would look something like this: https://opendev.org/openstack/nova/src/branch/master/bindep.txt And then projects relying on it document using the bindep tool like this: https://docs.openstack.org/nova/latest/contributor/development-environment.html#linux-systems Another goal of that tool is for it to use a file format which is reasonably human-readable, so that someone can work out dependencies fairly quickly from it even if they can't or don't want to install another tool to parse it. > And the distro maintainers do need to use binddep do parse that file and > "translate" it into the package names of their distro. [...] Yes, I don't know whether the OpenStack packaging team in Debian relies on it at all, but the intent is for it to be usable by prospective package maintainers for projects, at least as a means of double-checking against their declared dependencies. Its grammar allows projects to distinguish between arbitrary kinds of dependencies through the use of free-form "profile" names and many projects have settled on some common ones (particularly "test") to separate hard dependencies from optional or testing-related dependencies, but these concepts vary widely enough between different distros that I wouldn't expect a package maintainer to take the filtered bindep results directly without some manual vetting. -- Jeremy Stanley
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
