On Thu, Jul 07, 2022 at 03:36:30PM -0400, Boyuan Yang wrote: > Hi, > > 在 2022-06-28星期二的 11:19 -0400，Louis-Philippe Véronneau写道： > > On 2022-06-28 09 h 24, Boyuan Yang wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > I have encountered more and more packages that uses pdm-pep517 as build > > > backend. Looking at [1], existing packages in Debian added patches to > > > manually switch to other backends, such as Poetry. > > > > > > I am wondering if it's time to package pdm-pep517 itself [2], or is > > > there > > > any blocking for it. I am aware that some sort of bootstrapping might be > > > needed since pdm-pep517 seems to build-depends on itself. Besides that, > > > what > > > about packaging of pdm? Please correct me if needed: my mind and my > > > packaging work is still stuck in the old times of setup.py, and I just > > > started to look into the new ecosystem of pep517. Thanks! > > > > > > Regards, > > > Boyuan Yang > > > > > > > > > [1] https://codesearch.debian.net/search?q=pdm.pep517 > > > [2] https://github.com/pdm-project/pdm-pep517 > > > > Once packaged, please ping me so I can update the > > "missing-prerequisite-for-pyproject-backend" Lintian tag accordingly and > > let people know they can migrate to it. > > This is now accepted at https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/pdm-pep517 . > > Cheers, > Boyuan Yang
Brilliant! Thanks for this! (I think you'll need to do a source-only upload now to allow migration to testing, unless the procedures have changed recently.) Best wishes, Julian
