On Fri, Apr 15, 2022 at 03:01:43PM +0100, Peter Michael Green wrote: > But nowhere do I find any of QT_NO_OPENGL or QT_OPENGL_ES* defined in > the package (but then maybe I'm not looking in the right place? So I > don't know why these two classes are included in the amd64 version of > the package but not the armhf version. > > The reason is that QT on armel/armhf is built for opengl ES rather > than desktop opengl. I believe the reason for this is historic > hardware support on armhf systems.
Thanks Peter! Best wishes, Julian
