On 20-05-11 17 h 02, Louis-Philippe Véronneau wrote: > On 20-05-11 16 h 48, Utkarsh Gupta wrote: >> Hi Hans, >> >> On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 2:03 AM Hans-Christoph Steiner <h...@at.or.at> wrote: >>> Ok, this has become a bit more urgent since someone has moved my package >>> fdroidserver into PAPT without asking me. Now I cannot push commits to >>> it. So either someone needs to grant me PAPT access or put my package >>> back where it was in salsa. I'm fine with fdroidserver being in PAPT, >>> I'm not fine with being locked out of my package. >> >> I am sorry this happened (though I've no idea who did it). >> Whilst I don't have the right permissions/access to add you to PAPT >> officially, I have given you maintainer access to fdroidserver so this >> won't be a blocker to you. > > Hi, > > That was I, and I documented the process in bug #946105 [1]. As stated > on the BTS, the package was already in the PAPT but wasn't respecting > the policy, thus making team work harder. > > Looking at the package, it seems I forgot to push a patch to d/control > to change the VCS. Sorry for overlooking that, I did a bunch in a row > and must have skipped fdroidserver by mistake. > > I'll do that in a few minutes. > > Sorry if the changes to the repository path I made caused you problems. > > [1]: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=946105 >
Hmm, re-reading the BTS entry, it seems I went a little fast and didn't take in account you put the PAPT in the "Uploaders" field instead of the "Maintainer" one. I shouldn't have touched the package. I guess that's why I didn't originally push a patch. Somehow fdroidserver ended up in the list I gave to the Salsa team when I asked them to migrate a bunch of repositories for us. Again, sorry for the screw up :( -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Louis-Philippe Véronneau ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋ po...@debian.org / veronneau.org ⠈⠳⣄
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
