Hi Sandro! On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 07:13:49PM -0500, Sandro Tosi wrote: > where is the first draft: > http://sandrotosi.me/debian/py2removal/would_raise_to_rc.txt (it will > be updated every time the script runs) > > there are 703 unique severity bumps roughly half of the pending bugs. > please note there are duplicates in the list as data is per binary > package, while bugs are on a source package basis. > > you can read the heuristic to determine if it's a module > (https://github.com/sandrotosi/debian-tools/blob/master/py2rm_progress.py#L472) > or and app > (https://github.com/sandrotosi/debian-tools/blob/master/py2rm_progress.py#L475) > in the links, they are pretty weak, is there a better way?
I see that the script considers some -doc packages as modules. I can’t tell if we should remove them, but maybe the description could be updated? Like “python-foo-doc is a documentation package has 0 external rdeps”. Also, in other lines I would also change “have” to “has”. -- Dmitry Shachnev
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
