On 11/11/19 9:17 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote: > Personally, I've been judicious in putting myself as Maintainer in DPMT and > PAPT packages. If we were to ditch the current policy, my immediate response > would be to remove DPMT/PAPT from uploaders and maintain them outside the > team. It's about 1/4 of my DPMT/PAPT packages. > > I suspect I'm not the only one. > > Your proposal is not cost free for the teams. > > Scott K
Hi Scott, Exactly what difference would it make? Just that your package would really appear as not team-maintained, which is already the current plain reality (as the "unwritten policy" tells nobody else but you can touch the package). So I don't see why anyone in the team would mind. Cheers, Thomas Goirand (zigo)
