On 11.10.19 19:47, Matthias Klose wrote: > On 11.10.19 18:27, Christian Kastner wrote: >> This would nevertheless be a case for the "py2keep", right? > > No. > > #933348 is another bug for removed packages (mopidy-scrobler). Do you > really want to keep that?
Not at all, I'd actually prefer just dropping the Python2 version of python-cachetools. However, this breaks things, and it wasn't entirely clear to me much breakage is acceptable. > Is the mopidy popcon really enough to keep it? Don't look at the > popcon of any python module. The relevant popocon is the one for the > application. OK. > No, this is not yet done. Pending a dh-python upload. So assuming I had a Python2 module that needed updating (instead of outright removing it), I'd await this upload. Thanks, Christian
