On Wed, 24 Jul 2019 12:08:54 -0400 (EDT) Scott Talbert <s...@techie.net> wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Jul 2019, Ondrej Novy wrote: > > > út 23. 7. 2019 v 11:40 odesílatel Scott Talbert <s...@techie.net> > > napsal: When removing leaf python2 packages for bullseye, is there > > anything > > > > > > __modules__ package :) > > > > special that needs to be done, other than removing the > > building of the > > python2 subpackage? > > > > For example, obsoleting of the old package or anything along > > those lines? > > > > > > * check reverse-depends and "reverse-depends -b" > > * remove from d/control > > * remove from d/tests > > * remove from d/rules > > * check/remove d/python-* files > > * test > > * upload > > Thanks. The reason I asked about 'obsoleting' is because I wondered > about what will happen on the upgrade case. Say, I remove python-foo > from bullseye. When a user running buster with python-foo installed > upgrades to bullseye, what will happen? Will apt try to remove > python-foo? Not unless something actually Breaks: or Conflicts: or the user runs autoremove. If a leaf package bar changes from Depends: python-foo to python3-foo, then python-foo will remain installed. There are lots of packages in Stretch that are not in Buster. Upgrading leaves them in place unless there is something which actively Conflicts: or Breaks: them. That's why autoremove is so useful after dist-upgrade. > > Scott -- Neil Williams ============= http://www.linux.codehelp.co.uk/
pgpjaUC4ltKPU.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
