On Thu, May 02, 2019 at 11:36:56AM +0100, Neil Williams wrote: > On Thu, 2 May 2019 12:12:47 +0200 Olivier wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > I've read this [1] document but it doesn't include any example yet. > > > > 1. Do you know any Django application that is already packaged for > > either Stretch or Buster ? > > https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/lava is one. > > The problem is that this is much, much more than a Django application. > The lava-server package contains & deploys a web UI from a set of > django apps configured together. Questions about that package are best > sent upstream: https://git.lavasoftware.org/lava/pkg-lava-debian > > You may get more examples this way: > $ apt-cache rdepends python3-django|grep -v python3 > Reverse Depends: > freedombox > lava-server > graphite-web > dicoweb > autoradio > > > 2. How about adding in this Wiki page, a link to this example ? > > For the reasons above, the lava-server package isn't the easiest to > parse. I'm not aware of a hello-world type django package. The one > listed on the draft page was subsequently turned into lava-server but > then has been refactored several times and expanded in multiple > directions. > > > [1] https://wiki.debian.org/DjangoPackagingDraft > > The page itself is very old - 6 years with the Draft suffix and plenty > of TODO items. It mentions south migrations which don't happen anymore > with django from stretch or buster. The whole page is badly out of date. > > I don't know if any of the above packages ever looked at the draft > during packaging. I know that the lava-server package no longer follows > that draft in any meaningful manner. The page is still tied in with > changes to Django from django 1.2 to 1.3. The best thing for this page > might be that it gets deleted or at least edited to have a warning that > it is horribly out of date.
Or better: replace the page with what this thread yeilds Groeten Geert Stappers -- Leven en laten leven
