Hi, pá 25. 1. 2019 v 22:20 odesílatel Scott Kitterman <deb...@kitterman.com> napsal:
> I've added you to both DPMT and PAPT. As discussed on IRC, I think PAPT > is > the right answer for Tox. > thanks Scott. > > I'm actually a bit confused on where "tox" belongs -- Maintainer field > > seems to be set to PAPT, but in salsa it's under python-modules. It > > could be argued that it belongs in either, as it's a Python application > > used to develop and test other Python modules and applications... I > > actually don't really mind, but I would need access to both groups to be > > able to move it in Salsa. > tox should be in PAPT and it's: https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/applications/tox python-team/applications = PATP. > > On that note... what is the Maintainer field supposed to be post-Alioth? > > For DPMT, I see some packages in the archive with > > Debian Python Modules Team <team+python-modu...@tracker.debian.org> > > but nothing similar for PAPT. PAPT's page on wiki seems outdated, as is > > policy.rst on that front. > current (and only) valid Maintainer/Uploaders field is: Python Applications Packaging Team <python-apps-t...@lists.alioth.debian.org > team+python-modu...@tracker.debian.org is wrong (even for DPMT). > Finally, I've read python-modules policy.rst, and acknowledge that. > > That said, that policy dictates the use of git-dpm, but Ondřej Nový has > > already migrated tox to gbp, and I'd rather keep that change. > please use gbp for PAPT and DPMT. Policy is a bit outdated, sorry for this. Thank you. -- Best regards Ondřej Nový
