On Sat, Jan 12, 2019 at 04:39:44PM +0100, Bastian Venthur wrote: > > just drop the python-debianbts binary, without doing any kind of > > strange migration, and keep the name python-debianbts for the > > python3 package, as the Debian Python Policy states. > > I think there's an error in your advice and I can't figure out what > you mean. You're suggesting to drop *and* to keep the python-debianbts > package :) Can you please clarify?
Yes, I made an error there indeed (that I think Andrey corrected
already). But let my try again:
just drop the python-debianbts binary, without doing any kind of
strange migration, and keep the name python3-debianbts for the
python3 package, as the Debian Python Policy states.
As Andrey wrote, don't touch the source package name either.
Sorry if I spread confusion accidentally…
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
