On Sun, 24 Sep 2017, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi Yaroslav,
> On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 10:00:35AM -0400, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote: > > > I would prefer to move pandas to Debian Science or Debian Python. I > > > fail to see the specific use in NeuroDebian field. > > I ould repeat that I don't mind having it moved under -science or > > -python teams maintenance. But it shouldn't make it more difficult for > > me to maintain it. > Thanks for the permission to move the package. Could you please be more > verbose what exactly might make your maintenance more difficult? Its > about changing Vcs-Fields and Maintainer field - is this in some way > making things harder for you? nah, VCS field(s) is a non issue. making package non-backportable automatically, introducing new patch management mechanisms (dpq or whatnot) which I am not too familiar with -- such things could make things more difficult. If just a matter of moving a repository -- that is all ok as long as I know where to find a new one and could contribute ;) -- Yaroslav O. Halchenko Center for Open Neuroscience http://centerforopenneuroscience.org Dartmouth College, 419 Moore Hall, Hinman Box 6207, Hanover, NH 03755 Phone: +1 (603) 646-9834 Fax: +1 (603) 646-1419 WWW: http://www.linkedin.com/in/yarik
