On Thursday, February 16, 2017 12:42:59 PM Dimitri John Ledkov wrote: > On 16 February 2017 at 11:31, Piotr Ożarowski <[email protected]> wrote: > > Are you guys seriously considering dgit to replace anything other than > > dput in DPMT? I'd rather go back to svn-buildpackage than use something > > that will not allow me (f.e. as sponsor) to review before uploading! > > One can totally review before uploading with dgit. > dgit takes ownership/syncing of your dgit/* heads. > One can totally push master; review it; fix it up; push more; and then > as a sponsor if you are happy to publish master one invokes dgit push > to update the dgit/* branches & execute dput with a source matching > the git tree. > > Is this the workflow you want? > > dgit doesn't impose anything what one does with master branch, or any > other branch names you want.
Which is completely separate from the question of if we want to use it as a team. Whoever it was that suggested focusing on what (if anything) to replace git-dpm with (post-stretch) and leave the dgit discussion for later, I completely agree with. Scott K
