[Piotr Ożarowski] > > For instance, I have a source package (pytest-qt) which builds a Python > > 3 binary package and its corresponding documentation. Right now, they > > are respectively named python3-pytest-qt and pytest-qt-doc. > > I'd use python-modulename-doc even for new packages that provide > python3-modulename binary package only
Ok. > BTW, it's pytestqt, not pytest-qt so binary package name for Python 3 > should be python3-pytestqt (source name: pytest-qt) Considering pytest plugins aren't meant to be used directly, but by pytest via the registered entry-point, using "pytestqt" over "pytest- qt" for the binary package sounded unnecessary to me. And yes, I do know there is a policy and I follow it closely. In this particular case however, we would be breaking the consistency between the naming of the other pytest plugins for no obvious benefit to me. > > Shall we keep the current python- prefix (as per Python the language, > > not Python 2 the version) > > that would be my pick So given your criteria above, you would choose: - python3-pytestqt - python-pytestqt-doc Am I correct? Is everyone happy with that? Cheers, Ghis
