On February 9, 2017 10:52:04 AM PST, Nikolaus Rath <nikol...@rath.org> wrote: >On Feb 07 2017, Barry Warsaw <ba...@debian.org> wrote: >> On Feb 07, 2017, at 10:47 AM, Ghislain Vaillant wrote: >> >>>I know the discussion is leaning towards replacing usage of git-dpm >>>with gbp-pq. I have nothing against it but, since we are talking >about >>>solutions for a git-centric workflow, has anyone considered the dgit- >>>maint-merge workflow [1]? >> >> As I understand it, there are a few design choices that make dgit >less >> desirable for this team. > >No. You are confusing dgit with one particular way to use it. You can >use dgit with the maint-merge workflow mentioned above, you can use >dgit >with git-dpm, and you can use dgit with gbp.
OK. So then I gather it's effectively a layer on top of 'normal' things like gbp-pq or git-dpm? What added value would it provide? Scott K
