Barry Warsaw <ba...@debian.org> writes: > We've talked about eventually dropping git-dpm and just using gbp (with gbp-pq > for patch management).
There are some packages (I won't mention names) that have already started doing this. Would it be worth creating a concrete proposal to phase out usage of git-dpm in favour of gbp-pq? e.g. leave packages as-is, however on next update remove the debian/.git-dpm config file and unapply all patches. This could also wait until after the stretch release, however not sure if that matters. Or would dgit be a better option? I confuse I don't really understand dgit. I don't particular care what we move to, however it seems to me that we really should be dropping git-dpm. -- Brian May <b...@debian.org>