On Tue, 10 May 2016 at 23:29 Stefano Rivera <stefa...@debian.org> wrote:
> Hi Michael (2016.05.10_19:23:33_+0200) > > is there a specific reason why there are so few pypy-* packages in the > > archive? Is it just a lack of interest or are any practical reasons not > > to have them? > > I think we're all kind of waiting for PyPy 3, so that we don't have to > bring up an entire stack of packages (that few people are going to use). > > Personally, I've crated a couple, just to be sure that it all works > correctly. > I've added pypy-* packages to all of my packages that I can, the rest are missing dependencies. I think it would be great if we could get performance-sensitive applications running on PyPy instead of CPython, but of course this requires the whole dependency graph to have pypy-* packages built.
