On Apr 09, 2016, at 08:11 PM, Julien Cristau wrote: >FWIW I think that's a bad idea. A number of packages run their test >suite at build time, and running the tests with hash randomization >enabled seems to me like something we shouldn't give up.
Completely agreed. Although we're in the long tail now, during the bulk of the Python 3 transition, we found real bugs when hash randomization was enabled. >Couldn't packages where the binary packages contents depend on the hash seed >just set one themselves? +1 -Barry
