Hi Diego,
On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 07:34:39PM +0100, Diego M. Rodriguez wrote:
> > This was not really intended but now it happened. We now need to
> > decide about the two options:
> >
> > 1. Cancel the upload to new and drop the python3-jellyfish package
> > 2. Just leave this as is and follow the advise of the jellyfish
> > author quoted on top of this mail to the python list[4] to
> > rename just the Python module.
> >
> > I think option 2. is better for all parts and if you agree I'd
> > immediately cancel the upload to new.
>
> thanks for the detailed clarification on the events surrounding the
> package and the prompt response!
>
> I would be happy to go with either option (personally leaning towards
> option 2 as well), and basically rely on your expertise - the upstream
> string-jellyfish author has explicitely mentioned that he has no strong
> opinion on the Debian package name and I don't have either.
Hmmmm, ftpmaster was fast - now python-jellyfish is accepted. This only
leaves us option 2 without fiddling around to much.
> With this in mind, I'm wondering if this would be a good time to rename
> this ITP and the RFS (and the mentors package, etc) to the hopefully
> final Debian package name ("python-jellyfishstr"?)?
The latter sounds sensible. Sorry for all the confusion and leaving you
alone a bit with this issue.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
