Barry Warsaw <ba...@debian.org> writes: > In some of my non-team packages I've been trying to use gbp-pq more. It seems > not terrible, and at least it's maintained. Is it time to consider switching? > Perhaps just on a trial basis? When git-dpm works, it does work well.
I really like the work flow of git-dpm. Think it is much better then gbp-pq, which IIRC stores and distributes the patch files in git. Shame it isn't better maintained. As a result, seems it is very easy to get it in a confused state (e.g. by not noticing the local upstream branch needs a fast forward) and doesn't handle merging of branches. -- Brian May <b...@debian.org>
