That won't solve the problem, since both will provide the python module jellyfish
On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 1:24 PM, Diego M. Rodriguez <diego.pl...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 29, 2015 at 12:56:20PM -0500, Scott Kitterman wrote: > > I think the respective maintainers should talk and then discuss with > their > > upstreams as the collision potential isn't just in Debian. > > I'm chiming in as the (prospective) maintainer of the ITP python-jellyfish > package, just to note that I have discussed it with Andreas [1] and fully > agreed to rename "my" package. The choice of name was due to not being > aware > of the Python bindings on the existing DNA-jelyfish package (and in part > also > due to my inexperience on these matters), and I have contacted upstream > earlier today in the hopes of coming up with a good alternative name. > > I'd be happy to follow up on the discussion with upstream once I get a > reply, > in order to find out if he would be open to solving the conflict at a > "higher" > level. > > Best regards, > > [1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=806716#42 > -- > Diego M. Rodriguez > 36B3 42A9 9F2F 2CFB F79B FF9B B6C4 B901 06BC E232 > > -- All programmers are playwrights, and all computers are lousy actors. #define sizeof(x) rand() :wq
